For a year and half now, most college students in America have been barred from in-person learning. We have taken out student loans for already over-priced institutions only to be subjected to vastly inferior remote learning. For students who choose to remain on campus, rather than move back into their high school bedrooms, universities have implemented communist-style COVID rules and regulations that border on violations of civil liberties.
Across America, colleges and universities, including the University of Chicago, have allied with pharmaceutical corporations by mandating registered students be vaccinated by the fall of 2021 or be barred from class and campus.
Students in their late teens and early 20s make up a demographic more likely to die from the seasonal flu than COVID, making the requirement to take an emergency-use vaccine not only potentially dangerous, but absurd. Healthy students are being essentially reduced to guinea pigs for vaccines whose long- and short-term effects are unknown. Moreover, the unethical creation of most of the vaccines opens the door to concerns of conscience.
Students and their parents have a right to object to this violation of medical liberty. Below are six grounds on which students can object.
1. Students Are Not At Risk
Study after study has shown that college-aged students are not at risk of dying from COVID. In fact, they are more at risk of dying from the common flu or pneumonia, and universities have never attempted to mandate flu shots or any other vaccines to protect students from these conditions. Additionally, many students (including myself) have already had COVID, suffered minimal symptoms (if any at all), and possess natural antibodies.
The minute percentage of students who are at risk of being hospitalized or dying from COVID have comorbidities, which can be lifestyle-related, such as obesity and type two diabetes. Yet, instead of promoting health and fitness, universities across the country have foolishly made working out as difficult as possible.
Schools often force students to wear masks at all times, including in outdoor and indoor athletic facilities, even when they are performing strenuous physical activity, like sprints. They require students to sign up many days in advance for very short time slots (usually just 40-50 minutes). And some schools have completely closed down work out facilities altogether.
2. There Is No Legal Precedent
Vaccine proponents will argue that requiring the vaccine is standard, as today all 50 states have laws requiring specific vaccines for K-12 students enrolled in public schools (with occasional medical or religious exemptions). However, there are currently no state laws mandating COVID vaccines for school-age children or college students.
More importantly, only vaccines with full Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval have been state-mandated. So far, all COVID vaccines only have FDA emergency use authorization (EUA). This is grounds for legal protest, since these vaccines aren’t as well tested as long-standing ones, for which scientists know for certain of any short- and long-term side effects. For this reason, some states are introducing bills that would ban universities from requiring COVID vaccines.
3. Requiring Vaccination May Be At Odds With Federal Law
The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, which authorizes the FDA to grant emergency use authorization, requires the secretary of Health and Human Services to “ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed … of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product.”
Additionally, the FDA’s guidance on emergency use authorization (EUA) of medical products requires the FDA to “ensure that recipients are informed to the extent practicable given the applicable circumstances … That they have the option to accept or refuse the EUA product …”
When Dr. Amanda Cohn, the executive secretary of the CDC’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, was asked if COVID vaccination can be required, she said that under an EUA, “vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to [consent] and they won’t be able to be mandatory.”
The EUAs for both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines require fact sheets to be given to all vaccination providers and recipients which make clear that getting the vaccine is optional. “It is your choice to receive or not receive the COVID-19 Vaccine,” and if “you decide to not receive it, it will not change your standard of medical care,” states one recipient fact sheet.
When Congress granted the authority to issue EUAs, it chose to require that every individual should be allowed to decide for himself or herself whether to receive an EUA product.
Given the evidence, legal experts believe public and private institutions could find themselves breaking the law by mandating EUA vaccinations. Aaron Siri, managing partner at Siri & Glimstad LLP, a complex civil litigation firm, writes in Stat News that “an organization will likely be at odds with federal law if it requires its employees, students or other members to get a Covid-19 vaccine that is being distributed under emergency use authorization.”
4. We Are Guinea Pigs In Untested Waters
The Johnson and Johnson vaccine, which was administered to approximately 7 million Americans, was pulled by the FDA after six women developed a rare blood clot within two weeks of receiving their doses. The Johnson and Johnson vaccine fiasco doesn’t leave one feeling confident in the safety of other similarly rushed vaccines.
The abbreviated timelines for the emergency use applications and authorizations means there is much the FDA does not know about the vaccine’s effectiveness.
Worse yet, students are being required to receive vaccines by pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna, which, under the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness (PREP) Act, have total legal immunity if something unintentionally goes wrong post-vaccination.
Students should not be forced to risk the effects of a vaccine that the Big Pharma companies aren’t even liable for. And while the elitist medical authorities are telling us to blindly take their unlicensed vaccine, the American Nurses Foundation reported that 36 percent of nurses will not voluntarily take the COVID vaccine, suggesting strong COVID vaccine hesitancy even among medical professionals.
5. Medical Elites And Democrats Shut Down Alternative Treatments
Potential other COVID treatments have been largely rejected by Democrats and health officials who favor a massive vaccine rollout. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, has accused the medical establishment, health agencies, and Democrats of failing to explore and promote cost-effective repurposed drugs—those previously approved for other uses—as early combatives against COVID.
“They’re safe and they’re cheap and they just might be incredibly effective,” said Johnson at a December Senate hearing. He added that “tens of thousands of people have lost their lives” because government agencies have focused on expensive “silver bullet” solutions instead of medications already in use for other diseases.
Medical elites and government officials’ refusal to even consider alternative options causes one to wonder whether the vaccine is about health, money, or something else. Indeed Big Pharma companies like Moderna and Pfizer, which possess undeniable influence over American medical professionals and government officials, are projected to rake in billions of dollars from the COVID vaccines.
6. The Vaccines Raise Ethical Concerns Over Their Use Of Aborted Fetal Tissue Cell Lines
Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, and Johnson and Johnson vaccines used cell lines from aborted children in their lab testing and production processes. In most cases, the cell lines being used come from abortions committed decades ago, in the 1970s and ’80s. Some will argue it is not unethical to take the vaccine because by taking the vaccine individuals are not directly participating in the act of abortion, especially since the cell lines are far removed from the original aborted baby.
However, many pro-lifers believe that just because the cell lines are old and “removed” from the original killing, doesn’t change the fact that they were created by violating the fundamental human rights of a preborn victim. Additionally, pharmaceutical companies that continue to use aborted baby cell lines for research profit from the killings and encourage the ongoing evil that is abortion.
It doesn’t matter whether all readers view the use of aborted baby cell lines as unethical. The truth remains that there are legitimate concerns from those who do, and students and faculty have a right to object on ethical and religious liberty grounds.
Indeed, even legal experts who argue that, under guidance from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, employers may exclude employees from the workplace who refuse to be vaccinated for non-specific reasons, acknowledge they can’t “discriminate against those who cannot receive Covid-19 vaccines because of an underlying disability or religious belief.” Public universities seeking to mandate vaccines for students who object on religious grounds may face an additional hurdle: the Free Exercise Clause of the Constitution.
Normal everyday activities are now privileges to be earned via compliance. Students who refuse the vaccine face the scourge of social shaming and the very real possibility that they will be barred from attending in-person classes and participating in their campus communities.
The American university system has scammed students and their families long enough with overpriced, debt-inducing tuition. Since COVID hit, this system has deprived us of in-person learning, canceled or reduced campus services (while charging full price), subjected us to draconian lockdowns and mandatory COVID tests, and created a Chinese-style snitch culture and social credit score system for COVID violations regarding masks, tests, and social distancing rules.
As we look forward to the fall of 2022, things are getting even creepier as university administrators team up with powerful corporations using COVID to force students to take emergency vaccines that they don’t need, but Big Pharma desperately wants.
*The views expressed in this article solely represent the views of the author, not the views of the Chicago Thinker.
Here is a College undergraduate who is demonstrating what it means to be an educated, sovereign mind. She puts the law school to shame (who is the real law student?) She also underscores the power of young adult intuition, still largely independent from conflicts. The Harris “Dean’s Award” to Fauci; Booth’s relationship with the CEO alumnus of Microsoft and Gates; the CFO alumnus of Moderna pharma; or the Law school’s relationship with Obama (who recently teamed with Walgreens Corporation to push vaccination) are examples. The Pritzker Schools (Medicine, Molecular Engineering) of course are overflowing in conflicts. She also puts the Administration to shame. Who is the falcon, and who the falconer? Regards, ’96, Booth MBA
Bro u really typed that out and was like damn…yea this makes a whole lot of sense, a truly intelligent comment. And you’re pushing late 40s and ur this hung up on college news to the point that u know about who got the deans award a couple months ago? You peaked 2 and a half decades ago and I’m sorry that’s the case.
Being a contrarian doesn’t automatically make you right. It’s pretty clear that the author is being provocative for the sake of being provocative. Vaccines have been required in schools for decades (including UChicago!), and while technically speaking the vaccines are under emergency use authorization, in the real world there have been few serious side effects; a few exceptionally rare cases of anaphylaxis and blood clotting have been the worst that have happened; that the entire J&J supply was paused after only 6 adverse events speaks volumes about the stringent testing that the vaccines must go through.
Among the many concerns raised by Evita Duffy, fast-track testing is perhaps the most compelling. I’m currently representing a doctor in northern Canada who administered the Moderna vaccine to a discrete group of 900 aboriginal Canadians: several went into anaphylactic shock (which can kill if not treated quickly), several more had severe allergic reactions requiring emergency treatment, others suffered neurological deficits that will not resolve, and one patent died. The doctor tried to alert his colleagues and Ministry of Health officials to these dire outcomes. Result – the government has revoked his ER privileges and the College of Physicians is threatening disciplinary action for the crime of encouraging vaccine hesitancy. Don’t assume the authorities are interested in a free flow of information around their miracle cures.
On Point 6, there are religious and philosophical exemptions offered. On Point 5, there are currently early treatments in the works for COVID-19 that are still in the pipeline–issue still is cost and accessibility (Regeneron’s monoclonal antibody cocktail is too expensive to use for every severe patient). On Point 1, students with disabilities are at a fairly high risk (some immunocompromised people cannot get vaccinated or their body cannot produce a strong enough immune response after vaccination) and students do interact with people, who are at risk such as elderly professors and overweight/obese people of all ages. More people vaccinated, means fewer possible transmission paths for COVID-19, means we get out of this pandemic as soon as possible. Stop minimizing President Trump’s achievements and the work of American Innovators, and get vaccinated.
Bruh the literal pope thinks you’re wrong. According to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, “it is morally acceptable to receive COVID-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses,” and getting a vaccine “ought to be understood as an act of charity toward the other members of our community.” https://apnews.com/article/europe-coronavirus-pandemic-vatican-city-pope-francis-476fedf6a30e32c4c3d294027dd3c606
Very nice; now please write an article listing six reasons why you should bust a nut in my ass. I need this in my life.
For teens, vaccination is truly an act of charity: risks of disease are so insignificant in this population that the benefits of immunization cannot even be properly studied. The impetus for vaccinating this group is protection of at-risk adults by diminution of community spread. For the teens themselves, it’s possible that the harms outweigh the benefits. Healthy children may die so that sick adults may live.
“Let each one do just as he has resolved in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion” (2 Cor 9:7). But this doesn’t cut it for public health tyrants. Compulsory child sacrifice is needed — for the greater good, of course.
Bro most of the undergrads at uchicago aren’t even teenagers, tf are you talking about? Also why the hell are you citing the bible in a discussion about public health? Also your characterization of vaccinations as “child sacrifices” is so stupid that I have trouble believing that you actually go to uchicago.
To vaccinate or not to vaccinate is a question of moral behavior. Where would you look for direction if not the Bible?
I support modern medicine in conjunction with natural, healthier ways of living.
This COVID is another dirty germ disease – like TB, infectious hepatitis, lots of STD. It shouldn’t be a big surprise that extremely dirty places in India or skid row in LA have very high instances of Covid.
What is needed here in the Hyde Park, University of Chicago South Side community are effective programs to make everyone including the homeless :
Bathe, shower, wash their hands and faces with regular soap.
Most University of Chicago students probably practice good hygiene – others do not.
On a more positive subject – Is anybody else interested in a real world meet and greet – something like a picnic on our lakefront park. We can make strong efforts to protect people’s privacy in case people are worried about being “outed” as a Conservative at U Chicago.
I would enjoy meeting some of these brave, smart and I think “fun” U Chicago Thinkers writers and readers.
Evita, going against scientific consensus doesn’t make you a badass lone-wolf; it makes you a contrarian dumbass.
1) Have you considered that students are not…the only people in the UChicago Community? Teachers, staff, South Side residents, and just random people in Chicago are not necessarily (and likely aren’t) college-age. Well, giving a shit about people other than yourself does contradict the core conservative ‘Fuck You, I Got Mine’ ethos, so I’m not that surprised. Also universities definitely **do** require other vaccines. Not flue, but you have to submit your vaccination records upon enrollment.
2) Who cares?
3) Who cares?
4) 600k+ people have died from COVID (so far!) in the US. 0 have died from a vaccination.
5) If you’re miffed about seeing Moderna and Pfizer “rake in billions”, do you support nationalizing them? Do you support making all pharmaceutical research public domain? No? Then stop feigning outrage.
6) Who cares?
Science doesn’t make normative judgments, so there is no scientific consensus that you should get the vaccine or that universities should rely on vaccine passports. There’s also no scientific consensus that the benefits of childhood vaccination outweigh the risks because the comparison has not been studied. Your anger is misplaced.
bruh moment
You are approaching this wrong. Use the playbook to your advantage.
“I believe in EQUITY. Unlike other impoverished minorities, as a college student I have a significantly lower risk of dying from Covid. Through my CRT training I have learned only a white supremacist would rob a more needy impoverished minority of this vaccine. Therefore, in my support of honoring Biden’s goals of Equity, Diversity and Inclusion, I chose to selflessly donate my shot to India”.
Couldn’t fit the response for everything wrong with this article into a comment, so here’s the channel that’ll post the video response in a couple days. I’ll be sure to drop the video link as a response to this, but feel free to subscribe so you don’t miss out, and while you’re there, why not check out the video responding to Evita’s article on Authoritarianism at UChicago.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCFewtUXhq90oMoFQ8BZNmWQ
Someone else already posted it as a comment but the video on this article is up now, check it out to see all the everything wrong with it, with actual sources to back it up!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDse3aftnMM
Just as an example, section 6 starts with a false statement. Pfizer and Moderna didn’t use fetal cell lines in their production processes. Only JJ and Astra did that.
I don’t believe many of these points are actually good reasons to object to the vaccine, especially considering some of the factual inaccuracies. This brings up some sources that refute a lot of her points.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lDse3aftnMM