On the final day of the “Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy” conference hosted by the University of Chicago’s Institute of Politics, Representative Adam Kinzinger (R., Illinois) bluntly dismissed any doubts about the FBI’s involvement in the January 6 riot as conspiracy theories.
Kinzinger noted that there are Americans who “truly believe that those of us in government are into adrenochrome” and that “we [politicians] are Satan-worshiping pedophiles.” These theories, he implied, are just as “insane” as the idea that the FBI played a role in the violence at the Capitol:
[…] I think [the January 6 Committee’s] real audience is history. Because in five or ten years, when my kid is in school and he is learning about January 6th, I want him to know the truth. I don’t want there to be any shred of doubt that the FBI and Ray Epps somehow organized January 6th and an insurrection. Or it was the Deep State. Or it was anything but what it was, which was a Trump-inspired insurrection.
The outgoing congressman’s comments were awkwardly timed, as just two days earlier, Matthew Martin became the first January 6 prisoner to be acquitted for his alleged role in the riot. US District Court Judge Trevor McFadden ruled that based upon video evidence, Martin “reasonably believed” that police had waved him into the Capitol, and was unaware that he was breaking a law when entering the public building.
In addition, just hours after the event, a blow to the DOJ’s prosecution of an FBI sting in Michigan sparked renewed questions about the federal law enforcement agency. Following strong evidence of FBI entrapment, DOJ prosecutors failed to convict any of the four defendants standing trial for allegedly plotting to kidnap Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in late 2020. The jury found defendants Daniel Harris and Brandon Caserta not guilty of kidnapping conspiracy; after the jurors deadlocked on the remaining two verdicts, US District Court Judge Robert Jonker ruled a mistrial for Adam Fox and Barry Croft, Jr.
In response to this outcome, independent journalist Glenn Greenwald argued that the case fits into a decades-long pattern of FBI entrapment, which specifically targeted Muslim Americans in the wake of 9/11.
As Julie Kelly from American Greatness has documented, the FBI has been embroiled in a series of corruption and misconduct scandals. Like Greenwald and many other journalists, Kelly views this blow to the DOJ as vindication for her entrapment suspicions. In the attempt to ensnare the four defendants, “more than a dozen FBI undercover agents and informants were involved in the kidnapping caper,” she wrote.
In July 2021, the Federalist’s Max Morton aptly summarized the FBI’s involvement in the kidnapping plot:
The problem with the case is that it appears the FBI, through informants and undercover agents, hatched the kidnapping plot, served in the key leadership positions of the militia group, trained the militia members in military tactics, actively recruited participants, and funded much of the militia’s activities. Then, when various members of the Watchman militia became uncomfortable with the kidnapping plot, with several quitting, the FBI’s primary informant pushed the plot along, eventually becoming the militia group’s leader.
In the wake of January 6, many Americans – having watched the Michigan sting publicly unravel the previous summer – questioned whether the FBI had employed undercover agents or informants who incited violence at the Capitol as well.
In particular, Revolver News identified Ray Epps (among other rioters) as a potential FBI informant, pointing to the quiet removal of Epps’ name from the “Capitol Violence Most Wanted List” despite video evidence of his role as one of the “primary orchestrators of the very first breach of the Capitol’s police barricades.”
Though the Congressional January 6 Committee denies that Epps is an informant in a false flag operation, the DOJ refuses to admit how many FBI agents or informants were involved in the violence. It also refuses to release the 14,000 hours of video footage captured by Capitol Police during the riot, keeping it “hidden from the public even as clips [were] presented in court as evidence against hundreds of January 6 defendants.”
For many Americans, the FBI’s Michigan kidnapping scandal renews a distrust in the DOJ that traces a long arc of political corruption, through the Bureau’s illegal surveillance of political figures such as Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X under founding Director J. Edgar Hoover, the scandal-tragedies at Ruby Ridge and Waco, the post-9/11 entrapment of American Muslims, and the Russiagate conspiracy borne from Crossfire Hurricane.
As further evidence of FBI malfeasance mounts, it remains to be seen whether members of the January 6 Committee will be able to sustain Kinzinger’s narrative.
I am so glad I heard of your newspaper and web site on Tucker. Finally someone asks the questions that the over the mountain bigots, In this country, are contested by young, smart, and obviously intelligent journalism. Real journalism! Thank you all!
Sincerely,
Dudley P Allen
Right there with you. This paper is fast becoming one of my favorite reads. Keep up the good work all!
When Tucker said “Don’t trust anyone who used the word ‘Narrative'”, and then the Student responded about the Democrat Media “narrative”, I felt a glimmer of hope … Both Tucker and the Democrat Media love to push a narrative, of course, by now we all recognize the Narrative that the Democrat Media pushes … Neither one is comfortable when ‘low’ people are aware of and discuss the manipulation and the narratives …
Love what you were doing. please keep up the good work. I hope you will also capture the reaction of your fellow students to your journalism. I expect a lot of woksters heads are exploding.
Wonderful work! I sincerely hope your example will be followed by other budding journalism students in the years to come.
Also, incidentally, when I initially posted the above message, I received an error screen, informing me that my comment was too short…in German. Fortunately, I read German. But you might have someone look into that.
Cheers!
Kinzinger: “those of us in government…” (Stated with massive arrogance)
Not for long, Adam!
He basically said the quiet part out loud. He (and the illegal committee he sits on) are attempting to shape the narrative for future citizens (his kids) to “learn” the “story” of what happened on January 6th. He expects only one side- his side’s story to be told. Sorry Adam, your committee and the two fake Republicans sitting on it’s time is quickly running out. The other side will be told. The lack of respect Kinzinger shows for we the people to find our own truth independently is astounding. I guess he thinks we’re too stupid. The existence of this wonderful online magazine, Chicago Thinker, perfectly refutes his goals and his point of view.
Nice to see young college “journalists” presenting all available information on a topic which allows readers the ability to make their assessments based on the entire story. May this trend become the norm for our leaders of the future.
Watch this 5 minute video on the destruction of the Twin Towers, Building 7 and the Pentagon: https://www.bitchute.com/video/0nwR88z9Etiu/
There is no logical nor factual rebuttal of this proof that 19 Arabs with box cutters could not have done it
Very interesting article. But I need to ask a few questions before jumping on the bandwagon. I believe that disinformation purveyors are equal opportunity offenders: there are conservatives, moderates, and liberals who traffic in misinformation to serve their purposes. Your site seems primarily to be directed against what one might call “liberal” sources of disinformation. Do you decry non-liberals use of disinformation as well as liberals? Where on your site may I find take downs of disinformation other than that promoted by the liberal media? Το be totally on board with your efforts, I need to know it is “disinformation” you are targeting and not “liberal disinformation”.
Ηοw are you determining where “truth” lies? In the example of Biden’s laptop, 2 years after the fact, there is enough information to verify. But, how do you propose we arrive at a “final truth” to judge other major stories?
When the Democrat Media makes a false narrative, they magically all pile on board and parrot the same narrative, even the same verbiage and word usage – almost as if they are being coached or coordinated. In contrast, the Honest Media will present many different hypothesis, not all the same.
For example, when President Trump drone struck Iranian General Soleimani, there was a cold silence on the Democrat Media outlets initially — the newscasters simply related the fact without much commentary the moment it happened. In contract, Tucker Carlson immediately went into a rant against President Trump for starting World War III by bombing Soleimani. Tucker Carlson had the independence to allow him to immediately make his own statements. The Democrat Media newscasters, in contrast, had to weight about an hour until they had a clear *narrative*. This was simply an event to illustrate the clear difference.
It didn’t take 2 years to verify the Hunter laptop. The DOJ/FBI had it as early as December 2019 and sat on it. Yes, Trump appointed Barr and Wray officials. We called them out. Deep state actors. RINO’S at best, TRAITORS at worst. DEM’S would never do that. Dems CYO!
It didn’t take 2 years to verify the Hunter laptop. The DOJ/FBI had it as early as December 2019 and sat on it. Yes, Trump appointed Barr and Wray officials. We called them out. Deep state actors. RINO’S at best, TRAITORS at worst. DEM’S would never do that. Dems CYO!
I just discovered your web site. As a 76-year-old, Navy Vietnam veteran, and strong Christian, I’m thrilled to read what you are doing. Keep up the good work.
If you need a definition of the word “flake”, look up a photo of Adam Kinzinger. Someone has bought him, but we don’t know how much he thinks he is worth.
You guys are awesome, gives me hope that young people are not all self-hating anti-American pieces of schit.
Thank you!!!
Poor boy is mentally ill. Who voted this mental basket case into office? He has the brains of a tree frog.
I would buy this paper in a heart beat… REAL QUESTIONS! THESE ARE COMMON SENSE TO MOST, BUT ARE PAINFULLY HARD FOR THOSE INTRENCHED IN POWER!
IT’S FUNNY!
When I saw the January 6th kerfuffle on a neighbor’s TV, my first, and now enduring, question was “where are the dogs?” As an “old Wahington hand” of several decades ago, my favorite location was on the Capitol’s western terrace, watching the sun set over the Mall and the distant mountains. I never worried about “crime” because the Capitol grounds were heavily patrolled by the Capitol police K9 corps. A phalanx of the K9 corps would have stopped the crowd, IF there were any desire TO stop the crowd. But there wasn’t. Why? The unanswered question.
It’s nice to see the younger generation so well informed on issues and able to educated the purveyors of disinformation like the NYT, WaPo, those 50 “security professionals”, and your attendees. Nice job showing them that their lies are not going unnoticed. They have lied too long!
What i do not understood is actually how you’re not actually a lot more well-preferred than you may be right now. You are so intelligent. You realize therefore significantly in terms of this topic, made me individually consider it from so many various angles. Its like women and men aren’t involved until it¦s something to accomplish with Woman gaga! Your individual stuffs outstanding. Always care for it up!
Great selection of modern and classic books waiting to be discovered. All free and available in most ereader formats. download free books https://www.philadelphia.edu.jo/library/directors-message-library
I’m so happy to read this. This is the kind of manual that needs to be given and not the random misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.