After going viral for grilling The Atlantic’s Anne Applebaum about the media’s dismissal of the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, Chicago Thinker Senior Editor Daniel Schmidt appeared Friday on Fox & Friends.
In a clip that has over 2.5 million views on the Thinker’s Twitter account, Schmidt questioned Applebaum on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, during a Wednesday session of the University of Chicago Institute of Politics’ three-day conference on “Disinformation and the Erosion of Democracy.”
“Do you think the media acted inappropriately when they instantly dismissed Hunter Biden’s laptop as Russian disinformation?” Schmidt asked. “And what can we learn from that in ensuring that what we label as disinformation is truly disinformation and not reality?”
Applebaum responded by saying she was not interested in the scandal that suggests the president of the United States may be compromised by his son’s international dealings.
“My problem with Hunter Biden’s laptop is, I think, totally irrelevant. I mean it’s not whether it’s disinformation — I don’t think Hunter Biden’s business relationships have anything to do with who should be president of the United States. So, I don’t find it to be interesting,” said Applebaum, despite the fact that a poll found 16 percent of Joe Biden voters would have voted differently if they’d known about the contents of the laptop.
Reflecting upon the exchange, Schmidt told Fox & Friends that “[Applebaum’s] answer, frankly, was unsurprising.”
“Ironically, this was at a conference […] on ‘disinformation.’ And yet, the story that was probably the greatest example of disinformation—the Hunter Biden laptop, the way the media treated it—[Applebaum] totally ignored it,” stated Schmidt. “And frankly, I think it’s just an example of how journalists, the elite ruling class, view what Americans care about as irrelevant to them and as […] not worthy of any attention.”
Schmidt proceeded to criticize the overall climate in academia. “At a university like the University of Chicago, you would expect there to be […] some free dialogue. You would expect the students to be asking hard questions. And yet, me and my friend Christopher Phillips […] were the only ones actually asking these journalists these questions,” he lamented. “You feel like most people nowadays are totally uninterested in actually grilling them. They just accept what they’re told as truth. And they accept the censorship as just normal. It’s really worrying.”
“[I]f you’ve seen the clip at the very end, David Axelrod conveniently ends the question and then you hear people laughing. […] To them, this is all a big joke,” he added.
According to Schmidt, America’s “educated elite” consistently dismiss those who pose hard-hitting questions:
You know, if you ask these questions, you’re a “white trash” Trump supporter. You don’t “deserve” to be here. This is the “educated elite.” This is where we […] talk about “real” things, not Hunter Biden’s laptop—that’s for the “dumb people” in the South. And it’s disgusting and I think it needs to change. And I hope more and more young people are able to speak up and ask these questions, because that’s really what’s needed.
As a college freshman, Schmidt proceeded to reflect upon just how easy it is to rattle America’s elite. “As you see, [Applebaum] was clearly thrown off, because these people come to these university events, expecting no resistance, expecting students to just sort of worship them and ask easygoing questions, and when you even just tug at them a little bit, they clearly feel threatened.”
Applebaum was so threatened by Schmidt’s rhetoric that she has since blocked the Thinker on Twitter.
Question, did Sally Stelter, Mrs. Potato head, come over discuss his nonsensical, rubbish of answer to Christopher Phillips, as he said he was going to? Just curious. Part of me hopes he did just to hear what babbledygook he had to say, and the other part of me hopes he didn’t, as I assumed he wouldn’t, just to spare poor Christopher his endless, nonsensical drivel. Must be painful for young, brilliant minds (you know, unlike the one Stelter possesses) to have to sit through figuring out what the hell this maroon is saying. SMFH
As an aside, this legal eagle (now retired!) is very, very proud and impressed of the amazing work this publication puts out. Hope to see you at FOX News or the Daily Wire soon! And in politics, wiping out the left! You are all on to do great things for this country. Gives this Generation X’er hope!
Disinformation Symposium had a couple of Goldbergs, an Applebaum, an Axelrod. Where’s the diversity in that symposium?!?
It’s like both having both Country and Western music at the party. Your diversity is three different sides of the Democrat Media.
The panel people are usually shielded from questions by actual journalists. It is part of the prevailing, but seemingly waning, lack of freedom of speech that has produced elected officials who have not been vetted in an open election process. See Joe and Kamala as examples.
I’m so inspired to see young people thinking for themselves! Your boldness is exactly what this world needs. Not the “peaceful protests” we have all witnessed. Keep up the great work!
Takedown indeed! Just discovered your site thanks to your bravery to be there and call out these media frauds. You broke through every defense with simple truth bombs and exposed their blatant hypocrisy. Great work, great site, you’ve restored some small measure of my hope for the future. Glad that not all students these days are mind-numbed-woketard robots. Charge on!
As a 73 year old conservative, I am thrilled to discover The Chicago Thinker. My faith in this Country’s future is enhanced knowing there are young people like you who value our country and the constitution and recognize the path that the left is trying to take this country. Keep up the good work.
Thanks for another magnificent article. Where else may just anybody get that kind of information in such a perfect means of writing? I’ve a presentation subsequent week, and I am on the look for such info.
Throughout the great pattern of things you actually receive a B+ with regard to hard work. Exactly where you confused everybody was first on all the specifics. You know, it is said, the devil is in the details… And that couldn’t be more correct right here. Having said that, let me inform you what exactly did give good results. Your authoring is certainly really persuasive which is probably why I am taking an effort in order to comment. I do not make it a regular habit of doing that. 2nd, despite the fact that I can certainly notice the leaps in reasoning you come up with, I am not convinced of exactly how you appear to unite the details which inturn produce the final result. For the moment I will, no doubt subscribe to your position but trust in the near future you connect your dots much better.